![]() Anyway, what do you think about the choice to use single POV for this story? All Thorne's novels are this way and she seems to like having a limited POV highly skewed by the heroine's personal viewpoint and bias. Of course I thought that could've been single POV too, lol, but I can't deny it works. ![]() And upon thinking about this, I kind of get how it would work and lead to an equally rich story? It might be something like what Sherry Thomas did in His for the Night, where the hero is pretending to be a very silly man but actually isn't silly at all. But other readers proposed that it would've been nice to see him changing his mind and becoming more serious, that this would've more fully conveyed his character growth. In my headcanon, Teddy starts out being pretty cynical and not really being sincere in how he treats Ruthie. ![]() I feel pretty strongly about this, as for me, the story's entire magic was predicated on not knowing what Teddy was really thinking. But I thought I'd kick it off with a few discussion-based questions for those who've read.įirstly, the novel's single POV attracted a lot of post-mortem discussion. Below the asterisks is my typical TL DR review. ![]() ![]() I read Sally Thorne's Second First Impressions this past week with my delightful buddy-read bingers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |